首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Volume Overload with Cycler-Assisted versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis
【2h】

Comparison of Volume Overload with Cycler-Assisted versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

机译:骑车人辅助和连续非卧床腹膜透析的容积超负荷比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and objectives: Cycler-assisted peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) has been associated with decreased sodium removal compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) as a result of peritoneal sodium sieving during the short dwells that are associated with CCPD. This may have adverse consequences for management of extracellular fluid volume (ECFV). This study compared ECFV in patients who received CAPD or CCPD; CCPD dwell times were maximized by limiting the number of exchanges, and the use of icodextrin for the long daytime dwells was widespread.
机译:背景与目的:与持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)相比,循环辅助腹膜透析(CCPD)与CCPD相关的短暂停留期间腹膜钠筛查的结果与钠去除率降低相关。这可能会对细胞外液量(ECFV)的管理产生不利影响。这项研究比较了接受CAPD或CCPD的患者的ECFV。通过限制交换次数,可以最大程度地延长CCPD的停留时间,并且在白天的长时间停留中广泛使用艾考糊精。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号